Article

lock Open Access lock Peer-Reviewed

548

Views

CASE REPORT

Bypass and Ligation of Right Subclavian Artery Aneurysm in a Patient with Marfan’s Syndrome via Reoperative Partial Upper Median Sternotomy

Kevin R. AnI; Lamia HarikI; Talal AlzghariI; Roberto Perezgrovas-OlariaI; Giovanni Jr. SolettiI; Arnaldo DimagliI; Gianmarco CancelliI; Mario F.L. GaudinoI; Sharif H. EllozyII; Christopher LauI

DOI: 10.21470/1678-9741-2023-0300

ABSTRACT

Subclavian artery aneurysms are rare and can result in thromboembolism or rupture. We present the case of a 41-year-old man with a history of Marfan’s syndrome and multiple previous operations, who presented with an enlarging asymptomatic 5.2 cm right subclavian artery aneurysm and was successfully treated with a hybrid surgical operation.

ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS

CTA = Computed tomography angiography

INTRODUCTION

First ligated by Abraham Colles in 1811, subclavian artery aneurysms are rare and estimated to comprise 0.5% of all peripheral artery aneurysms[1,2]. These aneurysms are associated with atherosclerosis, trauma, thoracic outlet syndrome, Marfan’s syndrome, and other connective tissue disorders[3]. We present the case of an enlarging asymptomatic 5.2 cm right subclavian artery aneurysm in a patient with Marfan’s syndrome and multiple previous operations who was successfully treated with a hybrid surgical operation.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 41-year-old man who was monitored by serial follow-up imaging for his previous aortic operations was found to have an enlarging 5.2 cm right subclavian artery aneurysm. He was asymptomatic, with equal and palpable distal pulses bilaterally, and in no acute distress. The patient had a history and family history of Marfan’s syndrome (mother, maternal uncle, and maternal grandfather). In 2000, he underwent a Yacoub aortic valve-sparing root repair. Ten years later, he underwent a redo-sternotomy with bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement due to aortic valve endocarditis from viridans group streptococci. In 2011, he developed an uncomplicated type B aortic dissection which was initially medically managed, but later developed aneurysmal degeneration, requiring extent one and three thoracoabdominal aneurysm repairs in 2012 and 2015, respectively. During his previous operations, the right subclavian and axillary arteries were neither cannulated nor instrumented.

His preoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA) scan showed a 5.2 cm right subclavian artery aneurysm with posterior wall thrombus (axial view, Video 1). The patient’s most recent CTA scan performed five years before showed a small 1.7 cm right subclavian artery aneurysm. A three-dimensional reconstruction of the CTA scan demonstrated the proximal location and tortuosity of the aneurysm (Figure 1).

Video 1 - Axial computed tomography angiography demonstrating the size and location of the 5.2 cm right subclavian artery aneurysm Link: https://youtu.be/zVg2FdeA008

Fig. 1 - Computed tomography angiography with three-dimensional reconstruction of the right subclavian artery aneurysm demonstrating the tortuosity of the right subclavian aneurysm along with the base of the innominate artery and the right carotid artery (blue arrows)

Given his history of Marfan’s syndrome and type B aortic dissection, as well as serial growth on repeat imaging, we decided to pursue elective repair of his subclavian artery aneurysm. The patient was evaluated by a multidisciplinary team, including cardiothoracic surgeon and vascular surgeon, to explore management options. An endovascular approach was considered; however, given the size of the proximal innominate artery and the tortuosity of the common carotid artery, a device that would provide a suitable long-term repair could not be found (Figure 2)[4]. Due to his Marfan’s syndrome and young age, along with the long-term risks of stent migration and in-stent restenosis, it was felt that a hybrid approach involving a carotid-subclavian and carotid-vertebral bypass with surgical ligation of the proximal subclavian artery would be more appropriate.

Fig. 2 - Postoperative computed tomography angiography with three-dimensional reconstruction of the right subclavian artery aneurysm. The right subclavian artery aneurysm has been repaired with carotid-subclavian and carotid-vertebral bypasses, ligation of the proximal subclavian artery, and coil embolization of the thyrocervical trunk.

We performed a redo-partial upper median sternotomy and dissected free the innominate artery and origins of the right subclavian artery and common carotid artery (Figure 3). The right internal mammary artery was identified and ligated. The incision was extended into a right supraclavicular incision, and the carotid artery and large vertebral artery were encircled. The distal subclavian artery was identified in the supraclavicular space. Heparin was administered and the right vertebral artery was bypassed with a 6 mm Dacron graft in end-to-side fashion. The right carotid-subclavian bypass was performed with a 10 mm Dacron graft (Figure 4). The right subclavian artery and right vertebral artery were stapled and suture ligated, respectively, at their origins. An angiogram of the carotid-subclavian bypass allowed the identification of the thyrocervical trunk, which was coil embolized. The patient recovered well and was discharged from hospital on postoperative day three with no complications.

Fig. 3 - Operative view of the partial median sternotomy and supraclavicular incision. An operative view with the sternal retractor near the bottom right and the patient’s neck near the top. The innominate artery, sternocleidomastoid, right carotid artery, and distal subclavian artery are encircled with loops (blue arrows).

Fig. 4 - Operative view of the carotid-subclavian and carotid-vertebral artery bypasses. An operative view demonstrating the carotid-vertebral bypass with 6 mm Dacron graft and the carotid-subclavian bypass with 10 mm Dacron graft sewn end-to-side.

At three-month follow-up, he had recovered from his surgery and remained asymptomatic. His postoperative CTA scan demonstrated a thrombosed subclavian aneurysm sac (Video 2). His postoperative carotid and upper extremity arterial duplex revealed antegrade vertebral artery flow bilaterally and a patent right carotid-subclavian and carotid-vertebral bypass graft.

Video 2 - Operative view of the carotid-subclavian and carotid-vertebral artery bypasses. An operative view demonstrating the carotid-vertebral bypass with 6 mm Dacron graft and the carotid-subclavian bypass with 10 mm Dacron graft sewn end-to-side.

DISCUSSION

When present in Marfan’s patients, subclavian artery aneurysms are often associated with multiple aneurysms and dissections, similar to our case, and close imaging surveillance is recommended[5]. When left untreated, they can lead to thrombosis, embolism, or rupture. Approximately half of all subclavian artery aneurysms present with symptoms, including shoulder pain, non-specific chest pain, pulsating mass, local compression, numbness, paresthesia, and hemoptysis[3]. The size cutoff for repair of subclavian artery aneurysms is unclear due to the rarity of such aneurysms, although a cutoff of 3 cm has been suggested[6]. This cutoff is supported by a review of 147 supra-aortic aneurysms, including 30 right subclavian artery aneurysms, which showed that small supra-aortic aneurysms, with a mean diameter of 1.97 ± 0.46 cm, grew slowly at a rate of 0.04 ± 0.099 cm per year, with no observed ruptures[7]. The approach to repairing such aneurysms varies and can include a combination of surgical and endovascular approaches, including carotid-subclavian, carotid-axillary, carotid-brachial, and/or carotid-vertebral bypass, interposition grafting, arterial ligation, subclavian artery stenting, innominate to carotid artery stenting, vascular plugs, and/or endovascular coiling[5,6].

In our case, we considered an endovascular approach due to the difficulty of accessing the proximal right subclavian artery and the patient’s history of multiple previous operations. However, we could not find a suitable device due to the size of the innominate artery and tortuosity of the common carotid artery. Additionally, an endovascular approach would require stent placement in the distal common carotid artery, which has unknown long-term patency, particularly important given the patient’s young age. These issues are compounded by the increased risks associated with stent placement in patients with Marfan’s syndrome. A previous case reported a hybrid approach involving a carotid-subclavian and carotid-vertebral bypass with ligation of the subclavian artery distal to the aneurysm and covered stent of the innominate to carotid artery, which could be an alternative approach in cases where stenting of the innominate and carotid arteries is feasible[8].

Cases of right subclavian artery aneurysm in Marfan’s patients are particularly rare, with two cases reported to date[5,9]. Notably, both cases involved patients with multiple arterial aneurysms and aortic dissection, which required multiple operations to repair. This suggests that right subclavian artery aneurysms may be associated with particularly severe cases of Marfan’s syndrome and demonstrates the importance of close long-term imaging surveillance in this patient population.

CONCLUSION

We describe a rare case of a massive right subclavian artery aneurysm in a patient with Marfan’s syndrome and multiple previous operations. We provide a successful management approach for the aneurysm, involving carotid-subclavian and carotid-vertebral bypass grafts along with ligation of the aneurysm and endovascular coiling of the thyrocervical trunk in our patient.

REFERENCES


1. Lawrence PF, Gazak C, Bhirangi L, Jones B, Bhirangi K, Oderich G, etal. The epidemiology of surgically repaired aneurysms in the United States. JVasc Surg. 1999;30(4):632-40.doi:10.1016/s0741-5214(99)70102-3. [MedLine]

2. Colles A. On the operation of tying the subclavian artery. Edinb MedSurg J. 1815;11(41):1-25. [MedLine]

3. Vierhout BP, Zeebregts CJ, van den Dungen JJ, Reijnen MM. Changingprofiles of diagnostic and treatment options in subclavian artery aneurysms. EurJ Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;40(1):27-34.doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.03.011. [MedLine]

4. Shukuzawa K, Ohki T, Maeda K, Baba T. Endovascular treatment with aniliac branch endoprosthesis for a right subclavian artery aneurysm. J Vasc SurgCases Innov Tech. 2020;8(1):35-8.doi:10.1016/j.jvscit.2020.12.008. [MedLine]

5. de Virgilio C, Cherry KJ Jr, Schaff HV. Multiple aneurysms andaortic dissection: an unusual manifestation of marfan's syndrome. Ann Vasc Surg.1994;8(4):383-6. doi:10.1007/BF02133002. [MedLine]

6. Morimoto K, Matsuda H, Fukuda T, Iba H, Tanaka H, Sasaki H, et al.Hybrid repair of proximal subclavian artery aneurysm. Ann Vasc Dis.2015;8(2):87-92. doi:10.3400/avd.oa.15-00006. [MedLine]

7. Brownstein AJ, Rajaee S, Erben Y, Li Y, Rizzo JA, Lyall V, et al.Natural history of aneurysmal aortic arch branch vessels in a single tertiaryreferral center. J Vasc Surg. 2018;68(6):1631-9.e1.doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2018.03.412.

8. Resch TA, Lyden SP, Gavin TJ, Clair DG. Combined open andendovascular treatment of a right subclavian artery aneurysm: a case report. JVasc Surg. 2005;42(6):1206-9. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2005.07.045. [MedLine]

9. Dolapoglu A, de la Cruz KI, Preventza O, Coselli JS. Repair ofmultiple subclavian and axillary artery aneurysms in a 58-year-old man withmarfan syndrome. Tex Heart Inst J. 2016;43(5):428-9.doi:10.14503/THIJ-15-5509. [MedLine]

Authors’Roles & Responsibilities

KRA = Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved; final approval of the version to be published

LH = Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved; final approval of the version to be published

TA = Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved; final approval of the version to be published

RPO = Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved; final approval of the version to be published

GJS = Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved; final approval of the version to be published

AD = Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved; final approval of the version to be published

GC = Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved; final approval of the version to be published

MFLG = Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved; final approval of the version to be published

SHE = Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved; final approval of the version to be published

CL = Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved; final approval of the version to be published

Article receive on Sunday, August 6, 2023

Article accepted on Tuesday, January 9, 2024

CCBY All scientific articles published at rbccv.org are licensed under a Creative Commons license

Indexes

All rights reserved 2017 / © 2024 Brazilian Society of Cardiovascular Surgery DEVELOPMENT BY